There is a part of me that is afraid to let relegion go.Islam go.No matter how acutely logic dictates, no matter how deeply I think, I cling onto faith. Today,I asked myself why. I tried the elimination method first(the one they teach us while we do our MCQ's).
It is not because:
1. Fear of social acceptability.
Society is both the reformer and the assassin. Either way, it strangles. So over time, I have come to merely dismiss(or laugh silently) at social moral codes. I make my own yardstick of "right" and "wrong". A flexible, changeable, evolutionary yardstick. So no, I dont fear social acceptability.Infact, "weird" or "Crazy" is always a compliment.
2. Parental Pressure
Not really, no. My parents matter. But when it comes to beliefs, I do my own thing. Its always been this way.
I think, the real reason is that I am afraid of the uncertainity. And the gut feeling ofcourse. Something in me tells me not to forsake Islam. Ofocurse, the more "logical" minded would just counter this by telling me that my "gut" or whatever's "inside" me is a product of the enviroment I have grown up in. So it, most essentially, is not a free, unbiased opinion. I think like that because I know no other way, and if I do, the sense of belief-superiority has internalized in me, and I can't break free. Logic, for them, would be a fairly objective means of guaging if something stands, or is capable of standing on its own two feet. In the case of which, logic, for them, would be the onlyway to decide whether Islam can be called the ideal state of being and belief. Or way of life.
The second reason, for me, is the uncertainity. I doubt the powers of logic alone. Today, for example, if I act under the restrictions of logic and "rationale", and dismiss relegion as being "illogical" or "unscientific", what happens if, twelve years from now, I suddenely stumble onto something that tells me to believe in the exact opposite. That convinces me that Islam is, infact, correct. On every account. What if the warnings of hell, of afterlife, of the grave, what if they are all true?..Ah.yes. I am afraid. It's time i accepted that. I am afraid. That leap requires courage. And something in me just wants to keep certain avenues and options open.
Ever since I began to learn more about athiesm, and alienation from different relegions, I've struggled to explain things with Islam in context. I try to bring relegion in.I try tomake it reconcilewith logic. Maybe because I want an evolution of thought for myself. Not a sudden, erratic leap. Sudden insights exist. But they rest on a foundation of centuries of thought.
As most of my athiest friends would say, that's fairly impossible. Relegion and Science?..No. Absolutely nil compatibility.
I used to think so too. Infact I was so sure, that I told myself that if i was to remain a muslim,a believer, there would HAVE to be some elements of blind faith in me.
And yet, today I read something that made me wonder. The author said that Evolution, is not the cause of "random" mutations.(as science rests). There is a purpose behind these mutations. If for example, we were watching the Big Bang happening from a distance, it wouldn't have made much sense. It is only now, that we understand its importance. It led to us. WE gave it meaning. So essentially, its importance is beacause of us. It led toOUR creation, and WE, through our universal consciousness and out yearning to understand life and the universe, gave it meaning. So the wholepurpose, behind evolution, really, is US. The universe is in a constant struggle to understand itself, to explain itself, and that is why the dinosaurs had to come. That is why, the meteorite had to hit.That is why the amphibians happened, and that is why we evolved as human beings from the first lobe-finned fish. WE are not the effect of these events. WE are the REASON why they happened. It is in us, that nature culminates.
Frogs, fish, cockroaches, they just are. We are the only living creatures who try to understand this universe. The pair of cells, that holds our genetic material, that is what is passed down from age after age, being preserved, and reaching enough complexity in the human being to makehim think right back to the BIg Bang. Right across the stars and the galaxies. We are not just there. We see beyond our time. Because really, in the end, it is US that we are looking at. Through billions of years.
In this context, is it not possible that the genetic material, the macromolecule, that is the core of evolution, COULD evolve even further, and when it does, is it not possible that it can overcome the limitations of time. If it can, is it not possible that the "metaphysical" CAN exist?..Except its notreally "metaphysical", its just a higher stage of evolution. And in that context, is it also not possible that it is this metaphysical state, perhaps, that is reffered to as "heaven" or "hell". Or the End of this world?
Similarly, when Islam talks about "Ashraf-ul-Makhlooqat", the title that itgives to the human being, it is perhaps in this context. That the reason all of this universe happened the way it did, was US. WE, were the ultimate end. An understanding of itself(the universe)was the ultiamte end. And the only way it could understand itself, was through us . Evolution led to the highly developed human organism, but it was not random. Development of the consciousness WAS the ultimate end. Everything that happened was a means to that end. And sometimes, history HAS taken parallell routes to get to that end.
Science forgets to imbue meaning. It makes causal relationships, but it forgets context. And that is where "logic",per say,begins to falter.
They say matter comes before its products. In that context, the Big Bang existed, with or without us. We are aproduct of an event. They have similar ideas about thought and emotions. That they are products of an objective reality. But here comes the "chicken-and-egg" argument. It is true that the Big Bang existed before us, but if we assume that there was a purpose to the Bang, and that purpose was in developing a consciousness, then really, isnt the CONSCIOUSNESS responsible for the Big Bang. Is it not then, the other way around. The ONLYreason the big bang existed was to lead to the creation of a human consciousness. Similarly, the only REASON that the brain exists is to think. Everything it does, is to allow the vessel, or the body, that does the thinking to function properly. So the ultimate end, for it, is thought. In that context then, thought evolves from the brain, but its also the reason why the brain exists. Its two setsof objective realities complementing each other. And then perhaps, we can answer the question of whether a soul truly exists.
My mind is spinning. I need to sit down and think now.So more on thislater.